Reduced-Port Robotic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: The Marionette Technique and Soft Coagulation Lymphadenectomy

Article information

J Surg Innov Educ. 2026;.jsie.2026.00073
Publication date (electronic) : 2026 June 2
doi : https://doi.org/10.69474/jsie.2026.00073
Department of Surgery and Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
Corresponding author: Jae Hun Chung, MD, PhD Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, 20 Geumo-ro, Mulgeum-eup, Yangsan 50612, Republic of Korea Tel: +82-55-360-2124, Fax: +82-55-360-2154, E-mail: drjh1013@gmail.com
Received 2026 April 9; Revised 2026 May 21; Accepted 2026 May 22.

Abstract

Radical gastrectomy with meticulous lymph node dissection remains the definitive treatment for gastric cancer, and ongoing technical advances continue to focus on minimizing surgical trauma while preserving oncological safety. Robotic gastrectomy provides enhanced surgical precision through three-dimensional visualization and articulated instrumentation. Because a 3–4 cm umbilical incision is required for specimen extraction, maximizing the utility of this incision to reduce the need for additional ports represents a practical surgical strategy. Reduced-port and single-port approaches have therefore been introduced to decrease postoperative pain, improve cosmetic outcomes, and reduce port-related complications. Building on this concept, reduced-port robotic distal gastrectomy (rpRDG) utilizes a “4-arms in 3-ports” configuration that maximizes the utility of the umbilical incision while reducing surgical access trauma. A major technical consideration in rpRDG is the efficient use of robotic arms. In this video article, we demonstrate the marionette technique using endoclips to avoid dedicating a robotic arm exclusively to static traction. Briefly, the target tissue is grasped using an endoclip with a pre-tied suture, after which the free end of the suture is exteriorized through the abdominal wall and secured externally with a mosquito or Kelly clamp to provide stable, hands-free gastric retraction. Alternatively, the exteriorized suture can be weighted with heavy surgical instruments, such as long Kelly clamps, rather than fixed in place with a clamp. Additional instruments may then be added incrementally as dissection proceeds, allowing gravity-assisted traction with finely adjustable tension. This approach permits all robotic arms to remain available for active dissection, thereby improving operative ergonomics. We further present a strategic operative workflow in which bipolar dissection with soft coagulation using Maryland forceps is performed for precise lymphadenectomy around major vessels, whereas a vessel sealer is used along the greater curvature to reduce operative time. Through a representative case, we illustrate the fundamental procedural steps and technical principles of rpRDG.

Chapter Summary

00:00:01 Introduction

00:00:06 Case summary

00:00:26 Port placement

00:00:34 Liver traction

00:00:57 Omentectomy

00:01:16 Lymph node station 4sb dissection

00:01:45 Lymph node station 6 dissection

00:05:51 Duodenal transection

00:06:13 Suprapancreatic lymph node dissection (stations 5, 7, 8a, 9, 11p, 12a)

00:10:36 Lesser curvature dissection (lymph node stations 1, 3)

00:11:05 Gastric transection

00:11:31 Billroth II anastomosis

00:12:15 Petersen’s space repair

Notes

Ethical approval & Patient consent

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital (IRB No. 55-2026-078), with informed consent waived due to the retrospective study design.

Disclosure

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: JHC; Project administration: SHL, SHH; Writing–original draft: DL; Writing–review & editing: DL, SHL, SHH, JHC.

References

1. Jun JK, Choi KS, Lee HY, Suh M, Park B, Song SH, et al. Effectiveness of the Korean National Cancer Screening Program in reducing gastric cancer mortality. Gastroenterology 2017;152:1319–1328.e7. 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.01.029. 28147224.
2. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2021 (6th edition). Gastric Cancer 2023;26:1–25. 10.1007/s10120-022-01331-8. 36342574.
3. Li S, Zhang K, Chen L. Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: Robotic or laparoscopic? Intell Surg 2023;6:31–33. 10.1016/j.isurg.2023.04.001.
4. Karthik S, Augustine AJ, Shibumon MM, Pai MV. Analysis of laparoscopic port site complications: a descriptive study. J Minim Access Surg 2013;9:59–64. 10.4103/0972-9941.110964. 23741110.
5. Park SH, Ahn SH, Lee CM, Lee HH, Suh YS, Kim YM, et al. Outcomes of reduced-port robotic gastrectomy compared with the conventional laparoscopy in Korea (KLASS-13). J Gastric Cancer 2025;25:556–568. 10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e42.
6. Seo WJ, Son T, Shin H, Choi S, Roh CK, Cho M, et al. Reduced-port totally robotic distal subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: 100 consecutive cases in comparison with conventional robotic and laparoscopic distal subtotal gastrectomy. Sci Rep 2020;10:16015. 10.1038/s41598-020-73118-9. 32994484.
7. Wang CY, Chen YH, Huang TS. Reduced-port robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single-institute experience. BMC Surg 2022;22:198. 10.1186/s12893-022-01645-5.

Article information Continued